October 23, 2012 | Commercialization

Beyond Scale-Up, Part 2 of 4: Focus on Product Delivery

By Sanjin Zvonic, PhD, Director, Technology & Business Development

Let’s take a moment to focus on product delivery. In the context of CTPs, “delivery” is not a synonym for “shipping.” Delivery entails some (or all) of the following:

  • QC release and shipping from the manufacturing site
  • Receipt and storage at the clinical site
  • Pre-administration processing at the clinical site
  • Formulation and QC release at the clinical side
  • Bedside administration at the clinical site

Every move of the cell product from the point of manufacture until it is administered to the patient is part of “delivery”.

Cell therapy products come in many varieties. The source may be allogeneic or autologous, with some allogeneic products being designed for universal use and some for patient-specific use. Cells may be in frozen or fresh form with storage required for frozen cells. Delivery can be a multi-step process or sometimes a direct process.

However, regardless of source or formulation, the vast majority of CTPs are clinically administered on a per-patient basis. A CTP will be clinically important, and therefore commercially viable, only if it is robust enough to be delivered to the patient in an efficient, controlled, and reproducible manner.

Clinical-end Convergence

Delivery affects clinical development. Delivery consistency directly affects product consistency, which has a significant impact on the quality of the clinical data describing product safety and efficacy. Also, delivery procedures requiring significant resources at the clinical site make it harder to engage clinicians and accrue patients in clinical trials.

Delivery also affects commercialization economics. The quality of the clinical data directly affects development timelines, resource requirements, and the ability to fund the development efforts. Impractical delivery procedures challenge the commercial product acceptance by both clinicians and patients. Furthermore demanding delivery resources increases the overall product cost, and cost affects healthcare acceptance and reimbursement.

*This page may include mention of our past company names as it reflects content distributed in the past. The former companies Hitachi Chemical Advanced Therapeutics Solutions (HCATS, formerly PCT or PCT Cell Therapy Services), apceth Biopharma GmbH are all now operating under the name Minaris Regenerative Medicine. Hitachi Chemical Co., Ltd. has been renamed Showa Denko Materials Co., Ltd.

Stay up to date on the latest cell therapy industry insights

Related Articles

October 23, 2012

Beyond Scale-up, Part 4 of 4: Delivery Method Effect on Resource Demand

By Sanjin Zvonic, PhD, Director, Technology & Business Development If we look back at our chart of the resource demand as we move through the phases of development and ...

Read More
October 23, 2012

Beyond Scale-up, Part 3 of 4: Success by Design

By Sanjin Zvonic, PhD, Director, Technology & Business Development So how can a cell therapy developer use this knowledge to develop with commercialization in mind? Start by determining ...

Read More
October 23, 2012

Beyond Scale-Up: Managing Cost and Bedside Integrity of Cell Therapy Products in a Commercial Setting, Part 1 of 4

By Sanjin Zvonic, PhD, Director, Technology & Business Development The Future is Now In the future, physicians will write prescriptions for manufactured engineered cell therapeutics, as ...

Read More